Multiparty vs two-party systems: Which works better?
Americans feel constrained by limited electoral choices, but Pakistan's multi-party system shows democracy isn't always more inclusive
Arab-American and Hispanic voters back Trump in 2024, dissatisfied with Biden’s policies
U.S. two-party system limits diversity, while Pakistan’s multi-party system fosters it but risks instability
Stability favors two-party systems; diversity thrives in multi-party setups
Voters are fed up of America's two-party tug-of-war. Tired of limited choices, this presidential election millions of minority group voters swung toward Trump. Notably, Arab-American and Hispanic voters, disillusioned by Biden's silence on issues like Gaza, played a pivotal role in Trump's victory.
What if the U.S. had more options, like in Pakistan? Voters here get a broader range of options—PML-N, PTI, PPP, plus local parties for specific interests.
Would more choices mean better representation, or just more chaos? We explain in this video.
Popular
Spotlight
More from Video
Hoodbhoy reflects on AQ Khan’s nuclear role, Malala’s rise, and AI’s impact on education
In a podcast with Kamran Khan, Hoodbhoy says Pakistan’s nuclear program was driven by the PAEC, not A.Q. Khan, whose role was only 10%.
More from World
Iran says response to Trump's letter under 'assessment'
Iran says it will assess Trump’s letter before responding, as tensions rise over nuclear talks and potential U.S. military action
Comments
See what people are discussing