Tensions flare in Pakistani court as judge, rights lawyer clash

Proceedings at a Pakistani court grew tense on Thursday when the chief judge and a human rights lawyer clashed verbally, once again laying bare deep divisions within the judiciary.

Islamabad High Court Chief Justice Sarfraz Dogar clashed and Advocate Imaan Mazari, counsel for activist Dr Mahrang Baloch, had a heated exchange of words during a hearing on removing Baloch’s name from the Exit Control List.

The petition in the case was originally filed at the court on Oct. 12, 2024.

The exchange began when Justice Dogar remarked, “If I pass an order, Ms Mazari will go downstairs [in front of the media] and say a dictator is sitting here.”

Mazari denied the allegation, insisting her statements were within the legal framework. She argued that none of her comments fell outside the bounds of law.

The chief justice replied, advising her to “keep your mouth shut and remain within the bounds of respect.”

Mazari countered that her remarks were personal and should not affect her client’s case. “If you hold any prejudice against me, it should not impact my client,” she said.

Justice Dogar warned of contempt proceedings. “You commented that a dictator is sitting here instead of a judge. Why should I not initiate contempt proceedings against you?” he asked.

Mazari responded that she had exercised her constitutional right to free expression and was prepared to face proceedings if necessary.

The chief justice also warned, addressing Hadi Ali Chatha, Mazari’s husband, “Explain to her. The day I catch her, she will find out.”

Mazari replied, “If it has come to a stage where courts threaten lawyers, then go ahead with contempt proceedings.”

During the hearing, the Deputy Attorney General argued that the petitioners should first present their case before the cabinet sub-committee.

The court directed authorities to provide the relevant report to the lawyers and adjourned further proceedings in the case.