Russian envoy claims UK 'now directly involved' in Ukraine war
Statement comes after Kyiv fired UK-supplied Storm Shadow missiles onto Russian territory for the first time
Moscow's ambassador in London said Thursday Britain was "now directly involved" in Russia's war with Ukraine, following reports Kyiv had fired UK-supplied Storm Shadow missiles onto Russian territory for the first time.
"Absolutely, Britain... is now directly involved in this war," Andrei Kelin told Sky News, adding "this firing cannot happen" without UK and NATO support.
In the interview, Kelin was asked if Russia's use of Chinese technology, Iranian drones and missiles, and the alleged deployment of North Korean soldiers meant that those countries were also directly involved in the war.
"On that subject, I can say easily that we have plenty of mercenaries from different countries that are fighting right now on the side of Ukraine," the Russian envoy replied.
British media reported on Wednesday that Ukraine had fired the Storm Shadow weapons into Russia for the first time this week after London gave it the green light for such strikes.
The UK government has refused to confirm or deny the reports, with ministers arguing that public debate around the subject only benefits Russian President Vladimir Putin.
Russia claimed earlier Thursday that its air defenses had downed two of the missiles, without saying whether they had come down on Russian territory or in Russian-occupied Ukraine.
Washington has given Kyiv its permission to use long-range American missiles -- its Army Tactical Missile System (ATACMS) -- against military targets inside Russia, a US official told AFP earlier this week.
A senior Ukrainian official confirmed on Tuesday that its military had used the US-supplied missiles to strike inside Russian territory.
Using both the ATACMS and Storm Shadow systems to hit targets inside Russia had been a long-standing Ukrainian request.Popular
Spotlight
More from World
What's next for Musk after judge rules against him in Tesla pay case?
Court found CEO manipulated his own pay negotiations while owning just 22% of company
Comments
See what people are discussing